Relationships Essay -- essays research papers

How have three writings you have considered upgraded your comprehension of connections? Allude to Maestro and two different writings based on your personal preference? Connections are an unpredictable piece of today’s society and influence all zones. All connections are unique, and they impact the choices made by individuals and others around them. The three writings ‘Maestro’ by Peter Goldsworthy, ‘Dead Poets Society’ coordinated by Peter Weir and ‘Goodnight Mr Tom’ by Michelle Magorian all upgrade the comprehension of connections. These three messages, all show different sorts of connections, are totally introduced in different ways. The fundamental relationship introduced in ‘Maestro’ includes the improbable kinship created between an educator (Keller) and his understudy (Paul). The primary relationship in ‘Goodnight Mr Tom’ is somewhat comparable and includes the connection between an old man (Tom) and an evacuee he had to take on-a little fellow (Willie). At last the principle relationship uncovered in ‘Dead Poets Society’ is between an instructor (John Keating) and his understudies including Neil and Todd. These connections in these writings upgrade ones comprehension of connections by procedures utilized. ‘Maestro’s’ one of a kind strategy, isn't just the utilization of first individual, however how the entire story is a mix of flashbacks and recollections by the storyteller Paul of when ‘he was just a child’. From this point of view, the storyteller thinks about back this charmed time of youth and immaturity. His relationship with Keller is freezing from the outset, and we realize this is misdirecting through the main line when Paul cites ‘First Impressions? Misdirecting, obviously. As always’. The primary section is about Paul and Keller, and how they don't get along. Through the principal line, we realize this is a bogus impression of their relationship and that it will improve. This line Paul presents, for the most part portrays all connections. They are bogus on early introductions, as the individual isn't comfortable to you. ‘Goodnight Mr Tom’ has a conventional format, with ordered parts, and written in third individual. At the point when Tom initially meets Willie, it is a cumbersome encounter for Tom, and a terrifying encounter for Willie as to Willie Mr Tom ‘was a transcending goliath with skin like coarse, wrinkled earthy colored paper and a voice like thunder’. Anyway as one proceeds through the book it is perceived that William Beech and his relationship with Mr.... ...es, also, he genuinely accepts that he can't compose verse. Be that as it may, John Keating neither gives him a "F" nor lets him plunk down anyway causes Todd to put stock in himself. He says: "Mr. Anderson imagines that everything within him is useless and humiliating, isn't that correct Todd, isn't that your most noticeably terrible dread? All things considered, I believe you're off-base, I think you have something within you that merits an incredible deal." Saying this was sufficient to cause Todd to accept that he is similarly as some other understudies of his group can compose a sonnet. At the point when people experience achievement, they develop in self-assurance and as their confidence develops, they will feel progressively good to confront new difficulties. Weir attempts to pass on that occasionally to accomplish that certainty, a guide is required, somebody who can bring you up when you are down. The books ‘Maestro’ by Peter Goldsworthy, ‘Goodnight Mr Tom’ by Michelle Magorian and ‘Dead Poets Society’ coordinated by Peter Weir all pass on different messages to improve the comprehension of connections. Using different procedures, for example, portrayal, topics, and music, these writings accentuate the significance and estimation of connections.

The effects of coaching on nurse turnover Research Paper

The impacts of instructing on nurture turnover - Research Paper Example The wide extent of information assortment through triangulation will then again guarantee unwavering quality of results and finish of the examination. The speculation is significant in light of the fact that it will encourage assessment of the exploration question to decide if training that is offered to medical caretakers affects their likelihood of leaving the calling. The examination issue, connection between nurses’ turnover and training is then again significant in light of the fact that it will help in assessing instructing as a potential answer for nurture portability and deficiency. The examination subsequently has a capability of introducing an answer for the emergency in the nursing calling. Research plan This area talks about the examination approach and structures to be embraced. It characterizes the proposed approach along with its related points of interest and detriments. It additionally offers a diagram of the plan to be received and a correlation with elective structures other than depicting the methodology for the examination study. Research approach The exploration will apply quantitative methodology in its techniques. This is on the grounds that the idea of information to be gathered just as the exploration question to be addressed suits the quantitative methodology. Quantitative research for instance takes into account trial of speculation other than assessment of quantifiable factors. Quantitative research approach has various favorable circumstances. It for instance, when appropriately embraced, ensures unwavering quality of the outcomes and henceforth ends. This is a result of its use of measurable instruments in investigation to communicate the genuine highlights of the gathered information. The examination in quantitative methodology is consequently liberated from control dependent on the researcher’s perspectives and... The fundamental point of the investigation is the assurance of presence of a huge connection between training of nursing work force and the turnover rate. So as to accomplish this, the examination expects to gather both essential and optional information over participants’ recognition on the two factors. While optional information will be looked for from existing distributions, essential information will be acquired through structured surveys to be controlled to examined members. The exploration will additionally utilize randomized plan in testing to limit odds of biasness for unwavering quality. Likewise, triangulation of information will be created through choosing various associates of respondents that will incorporate students, mentors, and various subsets of enrolled medical caretakers. Information in the two factors will be gathered in numeric scale with instructing being estimated regarding viability and versatility being estimated as far as likelihood. The outcomes wil l at that point be investigated to assess presence of a relationship to address the exploration question. In light of the outcome, the examination will suggest vital measures towards finding an answer for the exceptionally detailed turnover rates.

Second Seminole War, 1835-1842

Second Seminole War, 1835-1842 Having endorsed the Adams-Onã ­s Treaty in 1821, the United States authoritatively bought Florida from Spain. Taking control, American authorities closed the Treaty of Moultrie Creek two years after the fact which built up an enormous reservation in focal Florida for the Seminoles. By 1827, most of the Seminoles had moved to the booking and Fort King (Ocala) was built close by under the direction of Colonel Duncan L. Secure. In spite of the fact that the following five years were to a great extent tranquil, some started to require the Seminoles to be moved west of the Mississippi River. This was in part determined by issues rotating around the Seminoles giving haven to got away from slaves, a gathering that got known as the Black Seminoles. Moreover, the Seminoles were progressively leaving the booking as chasing on their properties was poor. Seeds of Conflict With an end goal to wipe out the Seminole issue, Washington passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830 which required their migration west. Meeting at Paynes Landing, FL in 1832, authorities talked about movement with the main Seminole boss. Going to an understanding, the Treaty of Paynes Landing expressed that the Seminoles would move if a committee of boss concurred that the grounds in the west were reasonable. Visiting the grounds close to the Creek Reservation, the gathering concurred and marked a record expressing that the terrains were worthy. Coming back to Florida, they immediately disavowed their past proclamation and asserted they had been compelled to sign the archive. In spite of this, the settlement was sanctioned by the US Senate and the Seminoles were given three years complete their turn. The Seminoles Attack In October 1834, the Seminole boss educated the operator at Fort King, Wiley Thompson, that they had no goal of moving. While Thompson started accepting reports that the Seminoles were gathering weapons, Clinch cautioned Washington that power might be required to propel the Seminoles to migrate. After further conversations in 1835, a portion of the Seminole boss consented to move, anyway the most impressive cannot. With the circumstance crumbling, Thompson remove the offer of weapons to the Seminoles. As the year advanced, minor assaults started happening around Florida. As these escalated, the domain started getting ready for war. In December, with an end goal to strengthen Fort King, the US Army coordinated Major Francis Dade to take two organizations north from Fort Brooke (Tampa). As they walked, they were shadowed by the Seminoles. On December 28, the Seminoles assaulted, executing everything except two of Dades 110 men. That equivalent day, a gathering drove by the warrior Osce ola trapped and killed Thompson. Gaines Response Accordingly, Clinch moved south and faced an uncertain conflict with the Seminoles on December 31 close to their base in the Cove of the Withlacoochee River. As the war immediately raised, Major General Winfield Scott was accused of killing the Seminole danger. His first activity was to coordinate Brigadier General Edmund P. Gaines to assault with a power of around 1,100 regulars and volunteers. Showing up at Fort Brooke from New Orleans, Gaines troops started moving towards Fort King. En route, they covered the collections of Dades order. Showing up at Fort King, they thought that it was lacking in provisions. In the wake of meeting with Clinch, who was based at Fort Drane toward the north, Gaines chose for come back to Fort Brooke through the Cove of the Withlacoochee River. Moving along the waterway in February, he drew in the Seminoles in mid-February. Incapable to progress and knowing there were no provisions at Fort King, he chose for brace his position. Fixed in, Gaines was sa ved toward the beginning of March by Clinchs men who had descended from Fort Drane (Map). Scott in the Field With Gaines disappointment, Scott chose for assume responsibility for tasks face to face. A legend of the War of 1812, he arranged a huge scope crusade against the Cove which called for 5,000 men in three sections to strike the zone in show. In spite of the fact that each of the three segments should be set up on March 25, delays resulted and they were not prepared until March 30. Going with a section drove by Clinch, Scott entered the Cove however found that the Seminole towns had been deserted. Short on provisions, Scott pulled back to Fort Brooke. As the spring advanced, Seminole assaults and the rate of illness expanded convincing the US Army to pull back from key posts, for example, Forts King and Drane. Looking to reverse the situation, Governor Richard K. Call took the field with a power of volunteers in September. While an underlying effort up the Withlacoochee fizzled, a second in November saw him draw in the Seminoles in the Battle of Wahoo Swamp. Unfit to progress during t he battling, Call fell back to Volusia, FL. Jesup in Command On December 9, 1836, Major General Thomas Jesup eased Call. Successful in the Creek War of 1836, Jesup looked to granulate down the Seminoles and his powers at last expanded to around 9,000 men. Working related to the US Navy and Marine Corps, Jesup started to turn American fortunes. On January 26, 1837, American powers won a triumph at Hatchee-Lustee. Presently, the Seminole boss drew nearer Jesup with respect to a ceasefire. Meeting in March, an understanding was arrived at which would permit the Seminoles to move west with their negroes, [and] their real property. As the Seminoles came into camps, they were addressed by slave catchers and obligation authorities. With relations again exacerbating, two Seminole pioneers, Osceola and Sam Jones, showed up and drove away around 700 Seminoles. Maddened by this, Jesup continued activities and started sending assaulting parties into Seminole domain. Over the span of these, his men caught the pioneers King Philip and Uchee Billy. With an end goal to close the issue, Jesup started depending on cunning to catch Seminole pioneers. In October, he captured King Philips child, Coacoochee, in the wake of driving his dad to compose a letter mentioning a gathering. That equivalent month, Jesup organized a gathering with Osceola and Coa Hadjo. In spite of the fact that the two Seminole pioneers showed up under a banner of détente, they were immediately taken prisoner. While Osceola would pass on of jungle fever three months after the fact, Coacoochee got away from imprisonment. Later that fall, Jesup utilized an appointment of Cherokees to draw out extra Seminole pioneers with the goal that they could be captured. Simultaneously, Jesup attempted to fabricate an enormous military power. Separated into three sections, he looked to constrain the rest of the Seminoles south. One of these segments, drove by Colonel Zachary Taylor experienced a solid Seminole power, drove by Alligator, on Christmas Day. Assaulting, Taylor w on a wicked triumph at the Battle of Lake Okeechobee. As Jesups powers joined together and proceeded with their crusade, a consolidated Army-Navy power took on a harsh conflict at Jupiter Inlet on January 12, 1838. Compelled to fall back, their retreat was secured by Lieutenant Joseph E. Johnston. After twelve days, Jesups armed force won triumph close by at the Battle of Loxahatchee. The next month, driving Seminole boss drew nearer Jesup and offered to quit battling whenever given a booking in southern Florida. While Jesup supported this methodology, it was declined by the War Department and he was requested to keep battling. As an enormous number of Seminoles had assembled around his camp, he educated them regarding Washingtons choice and immediately confined them. Tired of the contention, Jesup requested to be diminished and was supplanted by Taylor, who was elevated to brigadier general, in May. Taylor Takes Charge Working with diminished powers, Taylor tried to secure northern Florida so pioneers could come back to their homes. With an end goal to make sure about the locale, the built a progression of little fortresses associated by streets. While these secured American pilgrims, Taylor utilized bigger arrangements to search out the rest of the Seminoles. This methodology was generally fruitful and battling calmed during the last piece of 1838. With an end goal to finish up the war, President Martin Van Buren dispatched Major General Alexander Macomb to make harmony. After a moderate beginning, arrangements at long last delivered a harmony bargain on May 19, 1839 which took into consideration a booking in southern Florida. The harmony held for barely two months and finished when Seminoles assaulted Colonel William Harneys order at an exchanging post along the Caloosahatchee River on July 23. In the wake of this episode, assaults and ambushes of American soldiers and pioneers continued. In May 1840, Taylor was allowed an exchange and supplanted with Brigadier General Walker K. Armistead. Expanding the Pressure Attacking, Armistead crusaded in the late spring notwithstanding the climate and danger of sickness. Striking at Seminole harvests and settlements, he looked to deny them of provisions and food. Turning over the guard of northern Florida to the civilian army, Armistead kept on constraining the Seminoles. Regardless of a Seminole assault on Indian Key in August, American powers proceeded with the hostile and Harney directed an effective assault into the Everglades in December. Notwithstanding military movement, Armistead utilized an arrangement of pay-offs and promptings to persuade different Seminole pioneers to take their groups west. Giving tasks to Colonel William J. Worth in May 1841, Armistead left Florida. Proceeding Armisteads arrangement of strikes throughout that mid year, Worth freed the Cove from the Withlacoochee and quite a bit of northern Florida. Catching Coacoochee on June 4, he utilized the Seminole head to get the individuals who were standing up to. This demonstrated incompletely effective. In November, US troops assaulted into the Big Cypress Swamp and consumed a few towns. With battling slowing down in mid 1842, Worth suggested leaving the rest of the Seminoles set up in the event that they would stay on a casual reservation in southern Florida. In August, Worth met with the Seminole heads and offered last promptings to move.

Strategic Managment Assignment Essays

Key Managment Assignment Essays Key Managment Assignment Essay Key Managment Assignment Essay IS AN INCENTIVE PROGRAM APPROPRIATE? Clarify YOUR POSITION? Answer: taking a gander at the present situation, motivator program is extremely suitable. This is on the grounds that, it help the business to recognize the different components like inspiration, abilities, acknowledgment, and so forth for a representative. Motivating force program can likewise be utilized to counter disappointment in the associations I. e. disappointment in meeting targets, poor conduct, or execution 2) IF SO, SHOULD THERE BE ONE, TWO OR SEVERAL PLANS? Answer: There ought to be a few impetuses programs like point program, worker motivators (which can be utilized to build representative good), deals motivations (which can be utilized to drive deals and lessen expenses and increment benefits). Different sorts of motivating forces can be bunch motivators. This is on the grounds that here, they need to work in gatherings. 3) WHO SHOULD BE INCLUDED? Answer: For the motivating force program, all the gatherings and people (representatives, line administrators and low line laborers) ought to be incorporated. 4) WHAT SHOULD BE THE BASIS FOR INCENTIVE PAYMENT? Answer: Â performanceâ appraisal, chiefs judgment, and so on ) WHAT KIND OF INCENTIVES SHOULD BE INCLUDED? Answer: The different motivations that ought to be incorporated here are increase sharing and benefit sharing motivators. Different motivating forces can resemble money rewards, rate increment in base compensation, and other non-money prizes. EXERCISE 11. 1) WHAT WERE THE KEY VA RIABLES YOU CONSIDER IN YOUR SELECTION OF AN INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP BASED PFP SYSTEM? Answer: The different factors that ought to be considered are as per the following: a)workers esteems outcomes(money, prizes) b) Outcome is esteemed comparative with different prizes. c) Desired execution must be quantifiable. d) Workers must have the option to control pace of yield or quality. ) Workers must be fit for expanding yield or quality. f) Workers must accept that ability to build exists. g) Workers must accept that expanded yield will bring about getting a prize. h) Size of remuneration must be adequate to animate expanded exertion. I) Performance estimates must be perfect with key objectives for short and long haul. 3) WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES WOULD LEAD YOU TO CONCLUDE THAT A PFP SYSTEM WOULD NOT BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE ORGANIZATION? Answer: The different conditions that would prompt disappointment of a PFP framework would be as per the following: a) Poor saw association among execution and pay ) The degree of execution based compensation is excessively low comparative with base compensation. The expense of all the more exceptionally persuading projects might be restrictive. c) Lack of target, countable outcomes for most employments, requiring the utilization of execution evaluations. d) Faulty execution examination framework, with poor participation for supervisors, tolerance inclination in the evaluation, and protection from change. e) Union protection from such framework and to change when all is said in done. f) Poor association between PFP results and corporate execution measures.

How to Reduce Tension With Progressive Muscle Relaxation

How to Reduce Tension With Progressive Muscle Relaxation Stress Management Management Techniques Relaxation Print Reduce Tension With Progressive Muscle Relaxation By Elizabeth Scott, MS twitter Elizabeth Scott, MS, is a wellness coach specializing in stress management and quality of life, and the author of 8 Keys to Stress Management. Learn about our editorial policy Elizabeth Scott, MS Updated on May 31, 2019 Compassionate Eye Foundation / Justin Pumfrey / Digital Vision / Getty Images More in Stress Management Management Techniques Relaxation Physical Techniques Time Management Effects on Health Situational Stress Job Stress Household Stress Relationship Stress Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) is an effective technique for reducing overall body tension as well as psychological stress. This simple technique involves the tensing and relaxing of all of the major muscles in your body in order from your head to your feet.  By tensing your muscles before relaxing them, you enable yourself to relax them more thoroughly after you release, letting go of physical tension more effectively. Fortunately, it can be easily learned and practiced virtually anywhere. Research shows that relaxing your body physically can also release psychological tension and stress, minimizing your stress reactivity and decreasing your experience of chronic stress.  There are other effective ways to minimize psychological and emotional stress, but PMR can offer you one more tool to manage stress, which can help you to build your resilience overall. With regular practice, the relaxation triggered by the PMR technique can come more quickly and automatically, making it a great go-to technique for many situations that involve physical tension. As you practice tensing and relaxing all of your bodys muscle groups, you can move to a shortened version of this activity, known as  Deep Muscle Relaxation, where you rapidly relax your whole body. (When practicing DMR, I like to imagine relaxation streaming from my head to my feet like water being poured, and gently engulfing me.)  As you reduce the tension you carry in your body, your whole being will feel less stress and you will enjoy increased physical and emotional health. How to Do Progressive Muscle Relaxation Here’s how to get started: Find Some Time.  Block off at least 15 minutes to begin.  I recommend setting an alarm for yourself, in case you fall asleep. (This will allow you to relax more completely, knowing you wont lose track of time.)  I also recommend finding a private place so youll feel more comfortable with step #3.Sit and Make Yourself Comfortable.  After finding a quiet place and several free minutes to practice progressive muscle relaxation, sit or lie down and make yourself comfortable.  Its more effective to stretch out and lie down, but if you dont have room to lie down, sitting in a comfortable chair is fine as well.  Unfold your arms, however, and uncross your legs so that you have easy circulation and your body is able to really relax.Start With Your Face.  Begin by tensing all the muscles in your face and scalp. Make a tight grimace, close your eyes as tightly as possible, clench your teeth, even move your ears up if you can. Hold this for the count of eight as you inhale.Let Go of Your Tensio n.  Now exhale and relax completely. Let your face go completely lax, as though you were sleeping. Feel the tension seep from your facial muscles, and enjoy the feeling.  Take your time and relax completely before you move onto the next step.  You can repeat this step until your face feels thoroughly relaxed if desired.Move to Your Neck.  Next, completely tense your neck and shoulders, again inhaling and counting to eight. Then exhale and relax.  Again, this step can be repeated until you feel absolutely relaxed in this area, particularly because many people carry tension in their neck and shoulder muscles.  Take your time, and let yourself go.Work Your Way Down.  Continue down your body, repeating the procedure with the following muscle groups:chestabdomenentire right armright forearm and hand (making a fist)right handentire left armleft forearm and hand (again, making a fist)left handbuttocksentire right leglower right leg and footright footentire left leglower left leg and footle ft footfaceneck, shoulders, and armsabdomen and chestbuttocks, legs, and feetPractice.  Then Abbreviate.  For the shortened version, which includes just four main muscle groups, quickly focus on each group one after the other. With practice, you can relax your body like ‘liquid relaxation’ poured on your head and it flowed down and completely covered you. A Word From Verywell This takes practice, of course, but it may take less time to develop this skill than you may imagine. Once youre able to relax your body from head to toe, your mind will feel more relaxed as well, and your overall stress levels will decrease as well.  This exercise can help you to minimize chronic stress and build resilience to the stress you face in the future. You can use progressive muscle relaxation to quickly de-stress any time, making it a wonderfully effective tool.

The Industrial Revolution Environmental - Free Essay Example

Isaiah Kessler Womack A05 Assignment #3 Rough Draft 19 November 2018 The Industrial Revolution: Environmental Decay in 18th Century Britain The Industrial Revolution followed colonialism and is marked as the time in which we as human beings progressed into the modern age. During the time of the Industrial Revolution there was a great expanse in technological innovations and many changes to human society. Major countries, such as Britain and the United states, that underwent large scale industrialization, turned into hubs of manufacturing and consumerism. Economics was fueled by supply and demand of product and the capitalist desire for wealth. During this time many new inventions came forward as many entrepreneurs driven by the alluring dream of wealth and power pushed to earn a living. Philosophers such as Thomas Malthus published new ideas about society and different ideologies revolving around the expansion of human population and consumption. However, it was during this time that environmental policy took to the back-burner. With new theories of economics and societal structures such as Capitalism, Socialism, and Utopianism taking shape, the environment as a social and economic concern lost viability and was removed from the scope of concern. An example of economics taking precedence over the environment is the introduction of coal as a main source of power and its heavy consumption which lead to huge environmental implications but great economic gain. The issue with these new social constructions was that they were concerned primarily with the success of man economically, and less concerned with the progress of man in the long run. Many philosophers talked about making money but then depleted the resources needed to make their money. Thomas Malthus actually predicted this over expansion and consumption when he said that population would outgrow its resources as a result of the Industrial Revolution (Chang). Entrepreneurs effectively dried their wells, which inspires me to ask the following question: How did the Industrial Revolution in Britain situated men against the natural world in terms of resources and control? My assertion is that during the Industrial Revolution in Britain environmental issues appear as a result of lack of understanding that assets must be protected in order to maintain growth and wealth. Environmental issues, which emerged during the Industrial Revolution in 18th Century Britain, were the byproduct of changing attitudes of mans relationship to his environment. This attitude was sculpted by several reasons; greater resource demands for capitalist growth, cultural systematic consumption, and changes in living habits by human beings. Understanding of the development of this attitude toward the environment is important to scholars today because as it stands our environment in in peril and to have any chance of future success, the errors of the past should be understood and acknowledged. There are several views on what really caused the change in relationship between man and the environment. For example, scholars such as Murphy and Grove claim that the cause of environmental neglect was a result of colonialism and the mindset of the control of the natural world. Domination and control were the premise behind colonial expansion and with this came a desire to dominate the natural world. Both Murphy and Grove explain that colonialism created a new understanding and relationship with the environment. This relationship involved controlling it and using the resources for ones own needs. The desire for new trading commodities leads to the utilization of natural resources and the eventual decline of the environment (Murphy 8). For example, ungulate grazing in Mexico by Spanish conquistadors resulted in a huge change to the landscape and environment in central Mexico (Melville 9). Colonialism progressed as a viable economic resource for wealthier nations and was very prevalent as a cause of climate change and global warming. Demand for resources was the beginning of man against nature, but it wasnt the defining moment that set our current track. It wasnt until the Industrial Revolution that there was a solidification of the use of resources for gain. There were new resources that had never been utilized prior to the development of technology. It is true that the impacts of colonialism were great, but the ideology of colonialism did not set up human beings for future decline. It is also possible to argue that the agricultural revolution is the cause for the mindset of man against nature. As ancient peoples first began to develop agriculture they often burned and destroyed natural forests to replace them with crops and pasture land. This movement from nomadic life to sedentary life was a primary cause for overall environmental decline (Gautschi). Human progression as a result of the agricultural revolution was a major cause for the beginnings of climate change and landscape changes. Many groups that were once mobile became stagnant and thus their impact was magnified. Concentrations of waste and consumption lead to greater decline of the environment as before the stagnation of populations the land had time to naturally recover from human interaction. The change from nomadic to stagnant life may very well be the start of all humans trouble with the environment, however with the development of industrial practice and the movement of more people into city centers there was an exponential growth of impact during the Industrial Revolution and into the modern age. The development of technology and discovery of new resources ultimately lead to the proliferation of environmental degradation; to a large extent the social and environmental impacts of resource frontiers were shaped by markets, innovation, and industrialization (Murphy 10). Progress of man leads to the decline of the environment and it was during the Industrial Revolution that historians can see one of the greatest booms in technological and societal advancement. This is especially prevalent in large nations such as Britain during the 18th and 19th centuries. Both industrialization and colonialism shared many ideals and basic premises that were realized and put into practice on a greater scale during the Industrial Revolution. Colonialism was simply a foundation for the Industrial Revolution and imperialism was the result of it. Resource consumption during early colonialism was hardly anything compared to the destruction wrought by the industrialization of major nations such as Britain and the imperialism that followed. Also, we see many thinkers during colonialism talk about domination of the natural world while in the industrial age the focus was on mastery of this world (Pisani). The difference between mastery and domination is that mastery is a complete control while domination is an exercise of control or dominance. During colonialism the main premise was the consumption of resources from other places where the impacts were seldom seen as they were out of sight and out of mind. Britain being a major contributor to colonialism was primarily focused on the acquisition of goods such as sugar and other commodities that were produced outside of its own borders. The Industrial Revolution marked the movement of production to the home front. In Britain, there was greater resource demand as a result of invention, capitalism, profiteering and desire for economic prosperity. This is demonstrated by Kenneth Sokoloff who presents a sample of patent records in the United states in the years 1790 through 1846 as an example to study and understand the trend of inventive activity during the Industrial Revolution. It becomes apparent that patenting was pro-cyclical and grew rapidly despite the hinderance of trade following the war of 1812. There is a strong correlation between patenting, inventive activity and market growth and this is a positive relationship where one benefits the other while also being improved. Changes in cultural attitudes, prosperity of investment, new methods of information transfer, production, specialization, resource availability and inventive behavior all were involved in industrial growth, which directly impacted/influenced the relationship with man and his surrounding environment (Sokoloff). This development is important to understand in the realm of mans interaction with the environment in that as man has a desire to create, he must inevitably consume. To create something new you must first consume and destroy the old and basic resource in order to make a new product. In the case of the Industrial Revolution the old is resources and the new is a shiny and exciting commodity. In this time of new creation also came the development of consumerism. Consumerism was initially born in 18th century Britain and was later spread to the United States and other more developed nations. We see consumerism sprout up with the introduction of slavery and the racialization of Africans as commodities and the development of cash crops. Many farmers began growing and producing products such as sugar and other unnecessary items rather than what was needed. This was also the beginning of the development of a more capitalist and wealth driven society. We see the development of the market system and the transition of views on self-gain from negative to positive. The economic mindset of the market system would leave the modern world essentially an economic world and the period of 1750-1914 became an era of the capitalist entrepreneur (Chang Lec. 1). It is in this time period that the Industrial Revolution occurred situating itself as the center piece for the development of the modern age and a movement into resource consumption on a non-sustainable level. Sustainability is the concept of allowing the environment to recover and with large expansions in production and usage it was not able to. The Industrial Revolution was characterized by the disregard for sustainability in favor of economic prosperity. The focus changed from the success as a collective to the success of the individual and the desire for consumption became the focal point f or development. The natural human desire for consumption and the development of cultural systematic destruction of the environment became most prevalent during the Industrial Revolution. Jacobus A Du. Pisani gives a excellent description of the human desire to control his environment and to become successful; As the Industrial Revolution was unfolding on the world stage from the 18th century, irrevocably transforming human societies, human progress was also linked to economic growth and material advancement. Donald Worster (1993: 178, 179, 180) describes how industrialization caused ?the greatest revolution in outlook that has ever taken place by leading people to think that it is right for them to dominate the natural order and radically transform it into consumer goods, that it is necessary and acceptable to ravage the landscape in the pursuit of maximum economic production, and that only things produced by industry and placed on the market for sale have value. (Pisani). We see that during the revolution there is little value in raw materials, but that value is found rather in consumer items and purchasable items like cigars and sewing machines. This trend progressed into the modern era as little value is placed on raw materials but rather on items that require some form of production. As a society Britain and other more developed nations saw the creation of jobs not associated with production as there are none available. There is a class of workers who are not producers, but solely consumers. As workers they are used for jobs such as book keeping or banking. They make money for the sole purpose of redistribution into the economic system, even if they are under the impression that it is for their own economic prosperity. Thus, the development of an entire class of consumers dedicated to helping the market system succeed. Today this has gotten to a point of being where there are not enough jobs and yet people without jobs are still consuming goods. This trend leads to more unsustainable consumption and the environment is further damaged. As a collective, humans have stopped producing for necessity but rather for economic gain. This desire for prosperity and success clouds the ability to see the repercussions. It was Thomas Hobbes that said that mans motivation for conflict stemmed from three main sources: Competition for gain, Diffidence for safety and Glory for reputation. He describes these motivations as human nature and that man cannot be blamed for them (Chang Lec. 2). As basic needs of man are consistently fulfilled he can look for s uccess in higher tiers of need. His position in society and his wealth become a primary concern as food and shelter or always a given. As society modernized the connection between man and the environment became less mutual and more parasitic as man began to give less and take more. Man relied less on the natural world and began to urbanize, separating themselves from the environment. During the Industrial Revolution there was a major change in human living habits and a mass influx of populations into more concentrated areas and cities. We see that during the Industrial Revolution there is a mass movement toward urban centers and cities as this is where work was available. Human beings crowded into these concrete and steel jungles and this resulted in an amplification of environmental impacts. There was a rampant spread of disease, and pollution was magnified by large numbers being collected into smaller areas. In Principles of Political Economy, first published in 1848, John Stuart Mill included a short chapter on the ?stationary state, which implied a stationary condition of capital and population, but not of human improvement. He states, I sincerely hope, for the sake of posterity, that the worlds population ?will be content to be stationary, long before necessity compels them to it (Mill 1883: 452 454). Mill was essentially stating that as human beings we should strive to continue to develop and be prepared for a stagnant lifestyle long before we are forced to live in one. With the industrial age came a mass movement to city life and humans became increasingly more stagnant. Just as stagnant water breeds bacteria and disease so do stagnant humans. As more jobs were in factories people moved to where the jobs were, at no fault of their own, as they had to move with the progress of production. During the Industrial Revolution in Britain environmental issues appear as a result of lack of understanding that assets must be protected in order to maintain growth and wealth. The attitude of man shifted from collective success to that of the individual. Environmental issues, which emerged during the Industrial Revolution in 18th Century Britain, were the byproduct of changing attitudes of mans relationship to his environment. This change in attitude was developed by several factors; greater resource demands for capitalist growth, cultural systematic consumption, and changes in living habits by human beings. Understanding of the development of this attitude toward the environment is important to scholars today because as it stands our environment is in peril and to have any chance of future success, the errors of the past should be understood and acknowledged. From the Industrial Revolution starting in Britain and outward into the modern age there has been a trend of disregard for the earth in favor of economic success.

Why Do You Add Salt to Boiling Water

Why do you add salt to boiling water? There are a couple of answers to this common cooking question.   Salting Water for Cooking Usually, you add salt to water in order to boil the water to cook rice or pasta. Adding salt to water adds flavor to the water, which is absorbed by the food. Salt enhances the ability of chemoreceptors in the tongue to detect molecules that are perceived through the sense of taste. This is really the only valid reason, as youll see. Another reason salt is added to water is because it increases the boiling point of the water, meaning your water will have a higher temperature when you add the pasta, so it will cook better. Thats how it works in theory. In reality, you would need to add 230 grams of table salt to a liter of water just to raise the boiling point by 2 ° C. That is 58 grams per half degree Celsius for each liter or kilogram of water. That is much more salt than anyone would care to have in their food. Were talking saltier than the ocean levels of salt. Although adding salt to water raises its boiling point, its worth noting the salted water actually boils more quickly. That seems counter-intuitive, but you can easily test it yourself. Put two containers on a stove or hot plate to boil -- one with pure water and the other with 20% salt in water. Why does the salted water boil more quickly, even though it has a higher boiling point? Its because adding the salt lowered the heat capacity of the water. The heat capacity is the amount of energy needed to raise the temperature of water by 1 °C. Pure water has an incredibly high heat capacity. When heating up salt water, youve got a solution of a solute (salt, which has a very low heat capacity) in water. Essentially, in a 20% salt solution, you lose so much resistance to heating that the salted water boils much more quickly. Some people prefer to add salt to water after it has boiled. Obviously, this doesnt speed the rate of boiling at all because the salt is added after the fact. However, it may help protect metal pots from  corrosion, since the sodium and chloride ions in salt water have less time to react with the metal. Really, the effect is negligible compared with the damage you can do your pots and pans by letting them wait around for hours or days until you wash them, so whether you add your salt at the beginning or the end isnt a big deal.